ValComply.ai checks the property valuation reports relied upon for self-managed super fund reporting against the ATO's requirements — confirming the value is supported by objective, verifiable evidence, and flagging non-compliant reports for auditing decisions.
AI-assisted review that supports professional judgement — not a property valuation, audit opinion or regulatory determination.
ValComply.ai assesses each report against the ATO's requirements for SMSF valuations — whether the adopted figure is a genuine market value, supported by objective and verifiable evidence at the relevant reporting date. It weighs the substance of the report, not its length or presentation.
Apply a structured framework across different report types, valuers and property classes so reviews are comparable and repeatable.
Assess a simple apartment differently from a complex industrial, development or related-party property — the required depth follows the risk.
See why a report received its grade, and identify the evidence supporting the conclusion — not just a score.
Separate material deficiencies from minor improvements that do not prevent reliance, so effort is focused where it matters.
Generate a concise auditor overview that can be provided to the accountant, trustee or report author.
Designed for the accounting, audit, superannuation, property and legal sectors, with language and outputs professionals can rely on.
These are not separate, competing scores. Together they support the overall tier-adjusted report grade.
Can the evidence, reasoning, calculations and adopted value be independently examined, traced and tested? This lens looks at whether another competent professional could follow how the value was reached.
Is the scope and level of detail reasonable for the property, purpose and risk? A concise report can be entirely appropriate for a simple, well-evidenced asset.
Standard property, strong evidence, limited complexity and low uncertainty.
More material value, reduced market homogeneity, unusual attributes, or additional tenancy, title or evidence considerations.
Specialised property, thin evidence, related-party arrangements, development potential, complex lease or title matters, or significant uncertainty.
A concise report may be entirely appropriate for a Tier 1 asset, while the same level of reporting may be inadequate for a Tier 3 assignment.
Acceptability is reported separately from the grade because they are related but not identical — a lower-grade report may still be acceptable with limitations for a simple asset.
Assigned tier, report grade, acceptability finding, evidence support, key strengths and weaknesses, and a recommended next action only where genuinely required.
Every finding with its severity and impact on reliability, the evidence located, a recommended improvement, and areas marked not applicable — a clear audit trail.
A concise, professionally branded summary that can be issued to the accountant, trustee or report author.
See how ValComply.ai applies a structured, proportionate framework to the reports your team reviews every week.